Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the acf domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home/elkabong/dev.ndnation.com/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6131

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/elkabong/dev.ndnation.com/wp-includes/functions.php:6131) in /home/elkabong/dev.ndnation.com/wp-includes/feed-rss2-comments.php on line 8
Comments on: 2012 NDN Probability Poll https://dev.ndnation.com/2012-ndn-probability-poll/ The Independent Voice of Notre Dame Athletics Fri, 11 May 2018 16:51:18 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4 By: Jim Prisby https://dev.ndnation.com/2012-ndn-probability-poll/#comment-7295 Fri, 10 Aug 2012 17:18:11 +0000 https://dev.ndnation.com/?p=2911#comment-7295 In reply to Crude Rude.

I’m sorry but I have a tough time uderstanding the love for MSU. Didn’t we hammer them last year? We matched up well against them and now their offense is one dimensional with a new QB and WR’s. They have a great defense but I think O will be clicking by then and we’ll score enough to win. I just don’t see them running well against our front seven with an inexperenced QB unable to beat us deep. I trust Diaco on this one.

]]>
By: BradChicago https://dev.ndnation.com/2012-ndn-probability-poll/#comment-7294 Fri, 10 Aug 2012 04:30:07 +0000 https://dev.ndnation.com/?p=2911#comment-7294 I think it is entirely possible to be better this year than last. Didn’t we lose two years running to Michigan on a last second play? Didn’t spank Miami two years ago and the rebuilding talk was just beginning for them? Michigan State and Stanford are looking for starting quarterbacks too?

I think 9-3 are possible. Look I’m not running Vegas with this; but other teams have not beat us so much as edged us out. I get it. A loss is a loss; however, one turnover less or one more from the defense. Maybe one more electric play that flips the field or inspires the team. One less blown coverage. Who knows?

The loss of the cornerbacks is the biggest problem. We didn’t get stellar play at QB so is it impossible to say either guy could do better? Could a d-line with one more year of experience keep some of the big plays down the field from happening by harassing the QBs early and often? Could they help hide the otherwise inexperienced secondary? As for the wideouts I expect Floyd’s yards can be soaked up in many different ways. He will be missed but as long as ND spreads the ball around enough to keep teams from doubling Eifert the moment he gets off the bus I don’t think overall offensive numbers will drop. Increased efficiency in the red zone can more than make up for his absence. I remember at least 2 fumbles on the one yard line that could better the offensive output of last year.

Of course I say all this and we are after all talking about a probability poll not a possibility poll. I guess that may look a lot different. Cheers. Go Irish!

]]>
By: irishhawk50 https://dev.ndnation.com/2012-ndn-probability-poll/#comment-7293 Thu, 09 Aug 2012 22:10:39 +0000 https://dev.ndnation.com/?p=2911#comment-7293 I see 8-4 as a decent season considering the schedule. Of course hoping for better, but trying to be realistic. Lou Holtz always said the biggest improvement was between game 1 and 2.

The trip to Ireland troubles me. In my past life I traveled extensively to Europe and those overnight flights where you arrive in the daylight after basically missing a night’s sleep were terrible. I would have urged ND to leave in the morning and arrive in the night local time, eat, go to sleep early and get up early the next morning and start up. I am also worried about the late start for the Purdue game. On your return you tend to get up early and tire earlier for a few days. A 1:30 start would have been advisable and, oh, I also have a trick play that I think would work! Go Irish!

]]>
By: Crude Rude https://dev.ndnation.com/2012-ndn-probability-poll/#comment-7292 Thu, 09 Aug 2012 17:35:15 +0000 https://dev.ndnation.com/?p=2911#comment-7292 ND was 8-5 last year. Here are three HUGE things that could have turned that record the other way………ND should have been 10-3 last year. Should have beaten USF, Michigan, and Florida St.

#1 Turnovers….turnovers….turnovers
I believe with a mobile QB there will be more yards picked up (by running) than throwing the ball to the wrong person, throwing it out of bounds, or a sack. ND should have beaten USF, and Michigan for sure (maybe USC). The big problem with those two-three losses was TURNOVERS!! Don’t get me wrong, there were a lot of other things that went wrong, but turn overs was 80% of our losses.

#2 Scoring in the red zone!!!!
I can’t count how many time ND had an opportunity to score inside the red zone. I know two red zones were sent back for TD’s (USF & USC). That was a turning point for ND when SC scored that 99 yard TD.

#3 Letting the opposing team back in the game.
Florida St. and Michigan come to mind. ND needs to conrol the second half of the ball game. I think they play to conservative in the second half.

Prediction:
ND’s QB will be Everett Golson this 2012 season. Everett has an excellent arm, quick feet, oh…and he can RUN with the ball!!! Rees was not a runner, which he had three options if the reciever wasn’t open…INT, throw out of bounds, or get sacked. Don’t get me wrong….Golson will make his share of mistakes. I also think he will have way less mistakes (INT) than Rees.
Kelly needs that mobile QB which I think it is Golson.

Record – 9-3 or 10-2 ………losses – USC or OKlahoma or both, and MSU

]]>
By: Jimbo https://dev.ndnation.com/2012-ndn-probability-poll/#comment-7291 Thu, 09 Aug 2012 17:04:15 +0000 https://dev.ndnation.com/?p=2911#comment-7291 In reply to drmarkj.

Ditto all around.

]]>
By: McPhurphy https://dev.ndnation.com/2012-ndn-probability-poll/#comment-7290 Thu, 09 Aug 2012 16:46:52 +0000 https://dev.ndnation.com/?p=2911#comment-7290 In reply to wow sir.

@ wow sir: Exactly! Stoney’s screen name just about sums it up.

]]>
By: Kevin https://dev.ndnation.com/2012-ndn-probability-poll/#comment-7289 Thu, 09 Aug 2012 16:44:17 +0000 https://dev.ndnation.com/?p=2911#comment-7289 In reply to dguerrero.

It seems like everyone is labeling BYU as a toss up. This surprises me. I think that one is a lock.

]]>
By: SH https://dev.ndnation.com/2012-ndn-probability-poll/#comment-7288 Thu, 09 Aug 2012 15:07:42 +0000 https://dev.ndnation.com/?p=2911#comment-7288 In reply to Patrick.

well.. now or next year for Kelly. He’ll be given a longer leash than prior coaches especially given ND’s projected to have the hardest schedule in the nation. He’ll have to really screw things up to get fired this year (like 2-10 screw up).

]]>
By: drmarkj https://dev.ndnation.com/2012-ndn-probability-poll/#comment-7287 Thu, 09 Aug 2012 12:22:42 +0000 https://dev.ndnation.com/?p=2911#comment-7287 Gentleman, we can all bleed Blue and Gold, but get real. ND hasn’t had the speed at the skill positions or on the defensive edge in over 20 years. Teams like USC and Oklahoma will exploit this. We’d be sub .500 in the SEC. Don’t blame Kelly. He’s overachieving. Until they can play a vertical game to go with the ground attack, and catch somebody, anybody, from behind, we’re doomed to “better than average”.

]]>
By: dwintx https://dev.ndnation.com/2012-ndn-probability-poll/#comment-7286 Thu, 09 Aug 2012 02:50:17 +0000 https://dev.ndnation.com/?p=2911#comment-7286 ND has not had a good team since Holtz departed. Academics too tough, weather too cold,
sub standard coaching, not enough goodies for athletes ( money, cars, etc ). This year will not be any different. I can hardly stand to turn on the game on Saturdays no matter how weak the opponent, but I still love ND.

]]>