Notre Dame raced to a 35-3 halftime lead on their way to a 49-20 victory over Stanford on Saturday. The Fighting Irish outgained the Cardinal by 524-312 and scored touchdowns on five of six first half possessions. Notre Dame ended its regular season at 10-2 after an 0-2 start. They entered this contest as the ninth-ranked team by the Playoff Committee. There were very few surprises among the other top twelve schools this week, so little change is expected.

There were two negatives in this otherwise lopsided contest. Star tailback Jeremiyah Love suffered a rib injury that was obviously painful. He returned to action later but was not his usual dominant self. Also, the level of execution by the Irish in the second half was well below their standard. If Notre Dame makes the playoffs as anticipated, the team will have three weeks to rest, recover, and prepare.
Let’s review the answers to our pregame questions:
- Can Stanfordβs struggling offensive line handle the Irish defensive front? Yes, at least in pass protection. Notre Dame sent extra rushers on many plays but rarely disturbed the quarterback. Stanford rushed for only 86 yards, however, which is about their average.
- Will the aggressive Notre Dame secondary continue to generate turnovers? Leonard Moore’s spectacular interception was the only turnover recorded by the Irish. Safety Adon Shuler also hurt Stanford’s tender feelings with a crushing hit on wideout Caden High.
- Can the Irish duplicate the intensity level they demonstrated last week? Only in the first half. After intermission, it was as if their body clocks were telling them it was time to sleep.
- Will Carr take advantage if Stanford overplays the run? Somewhat, but Carr’s passing yards were modest except for a 54-yard bomb to Jordan Faison.
- Can Notre Dame run the ball against the Cardinal front seven? They rushed for 187 but the only significant play was a 51-yard scoring sprint by Aneyas Williams.
- Will Love or Ford run for more yards and scores? Ford was unable to play due to an injury suffered in practice prior to the game. Love recorded a touchdown on the first series, in which he gained 54 of the team’s 66 yards.
- Can Notre Dameβs special teams make a significant contribution? Marcus Freeman called for a fake punt from his own 16-yard line. Josh Burnham tossed a short pass to Luke Talich, who flew past the Cardinal for an 84-yard touchdown. In the kicking game, Eric Schmidt’s seven extra points somehow made it through the uprights. At least three would not have been good from five yards further out.
- Will the Irish defense give up another last second touchdown? They surrendered a touchdown pass to the Stanford reserves with four minutes left. The Cardinal quarterback was Charlie Mirer, son of Irish great Rick Mirer. A late fumble by Notre Dame prevented them from answering in the game’s final seconds.
I expect Notre Dame to remain as the ninth seeded team in the playoff derby when the rankings are released on Tuesday. It is possible that the Irish could leap into the eighth spot over Oklahoma. The Sooners’ offense was awful in a home win over equally hapless LSU. Conference championship games next Saturday, most notably in the SEC and Big-12, will determine the final seeding, There are theoretical scenarios in which Notre Dame could lose its spot entirely, but I am not overly concerned. Previous statements from the Committee indicate they are convinced the Irish belong among the top 12 teams.
Tell John what you think in the Comments Section below
Dr Nick says:
Good assessment. The cheap shot on Love was infuriating. BYU should get smoked again. I would be shocked to see Alabama win after watching them last night, they have no run game. Canβt wait to see our team on the field at near π―. Go Irish!
The Obvious says:
Good to read something positive about a playoff seed for the Irish. Way too many Nervous Nellies commenting about all the negative “what-could-happen” scenarios. Relax, you Nellies!
John Vannie says:
Note to all: I recreated a shortened version of this recap after a site malfunction (human error) resulted in six months of articles and comments to disappear early this morning. It does not appear that this data can be recovered. I apologize for the inconvenience.
Dr Nick says:
Heck of a way to start your day on little sleep π€¦ββοΈ.
Maybe this site could be of use:
https://web.archive.org/web/20250803210908/https://dev.ndnation.com/
Mike Coffey says:
My fault
Dr Nick says:
You just need some CS or engineering Irish undergrads to volunteer some time to help bail you out π.
Mike Coffey says:
Or someone who knows better than to update a configuration file without downloading it from the server first.
Mike the Third says:
You had me worried when I couldnβt pull up your usual excellent and timely post game article; all sorts of conspiracy theories popped in my sleep deprived head.So glad your back; sorry for your troubles; keep up your great work. It is appreciated.
Mike says:
Did Rick Mirer’s son Charlie look good because he is good or was it because it was mop-up time in the game? He appeared to be the much better Stanford quarterback.
Coleman Clarke says:
I agree with your analysis as usual. Im disappointed in the lack of intensity in the second half and am not a fan of Denbrock. I think his play calling and style keeps this team from establishing a rhythm needed to put teams away in some of these games. Itβs very frustrating to watch this team at times being hamstrung by this manβs inability to work to this teamβs strengths. Yes Notre Dame can be prolific offensively at times, but these lulls that they get into could doom them against much better teams. Lastly, Freeman needs to stand up for his team with the dirty play by Stanford. ( who always plays this way) He should immediately talk to the refs and perhaps ask for a timeout to confront Frank Reich about it. Him being a former player may even hold more weight. Plus he is young and more than capable given his size to convey toughness by confronting these other teamβs coaches and demanding that this nonsense stop. Boston College also employed the same dirty techniques. Other than those gripes, this was a good season. The fact that many of us fans are not happy shows an upward trend in greater expectations for this team, which is a very good sign.
John Vannie says:
Maybe we should just get ourselves out of the disastrous agreement to play these craptastic ACC teams.
d says:
Agreed. There does seem to be a lot of negative comments by ACC coaches toward ND football, at times one might call it an aspect of passive aggressive behavior. Some of the Olympic sports would need to find competition somewhere. I believe hockey does it because not all ACC teams have hockey.
Irishwest says:
I was at the game, and it sure looked as though Stanford focused on Love. Lots of scrums in the line which are hard for officials to see. They were very physical when he had the ball. Left early to avoid traffic and did not see the long run by Williams. He ran with a lot of determination.
Will says:
After being at the game last night, I have several observations: 1) Andrew Luck has a daunting challenge to revive the Stanford football program as his talent level is poor and his fan support is even poorer. 2) I was really impressed with C.J. Carr. He sees the field very well, consistently makes the right decision, and throws a very catchable ball. His experience over the 12 games of the season has made him an elite qb at a very young age. 3) Aneyas Williams brings some very unique skills to the Irish backfield in that he is an excellent route runner and has great hands. He also possesses an unexpected acceleration in the open field. 4). I was impressed with the pass plays that Denbrock has finally created for the red zone. 5.) In the second half ND looked gassed (jet lagged). This certainly had something to do with the absurd kickoff time but if you go back in history ND has shown a similar 2nd half lethargy (going all the way back to the infamous collapse in the Coliseum in 1964) in many of their season ending games on the West Coast.
Ndvette says:
Nice wrap-up John. “Craptastic” live it. Dsapointed in tne performance In later part of the game.it made a blowout look like the was a game involved. Also as a side do you agree the ridiculous trend on reviewing a play and having to hear “the rolling on the field is upheld” regardless of the film showing the exact opposite?
John Vannie says:
Yeah, Ty Washington was robbed of a great catch
Scott says:
I am glad I was not the only one who saw this, Vannie. My 13 yr old daughter even said, “He caught that with one foot in bounds!! Those refs SUCK!!!”
That was a nice grab negated by conference biased refs.
Irish Rifle says:
Nobody will ever convince me that the play that injured Love, when he was down on the ground only to have a Stanford lineman drive his knees into his back, wasn’t intentional. This was one of the most dirty plays I have ever seen in a football game. That player should be dismissed from the Stanford team for his outrageous and unsportsmanlike conduct.
Mike Coffey says:
I wouldn’t go that far, but I agree with you the Stanford players were looking to put a hurt on Love.
John Vannie says:
Stanford will probably give him a medal
Scott says:
Andrew Luck probably congratated him for the dirty play.
joe barrett says:
Hello John,
Great summary as usual!! Really happy the year ND had!! That was quite a scared regarding Love’s injury. But he seems to be okay!! John, in your opinion do you feel ND should be ahead of Miami in the CFP and who do you think will win the GA vs Bama game and the TT vs BYU game? Hope you had a nice Thanksgiving!!
John Vannie says:
ND was ahead of Miami last week and should remain there.
I think Georgia and Texas Tech should win but thatβs hardly a guarantee.
NBND75 says:
Who was worse: the refs or the announcers? It seemed that at the end the announcers were feeling some heat from call-ins about the bias towards Miami getting in CFP they were showing all game. Heard ACC getting pressure to be neutral on Notre Dame v Miami lobbying. Possible there might be concerns we might reevaluate staying in conference if we arenβt treated the same as other conference members wherein the conference doesnβt lobby for one member over another.
And Stanford absolutely cheap shotted Love by kneeing his ribs after play was over. Typical.
Scott says:
The announcers were garbage. They kept right on being totally positive about the lame duck team, but negative about ND. But, when the jerk said he would not have called targeting on the dirty and late hit on Minchey, that guy should never be in any booth again, PERIOD!! That hit was totally intentional and most definitely targeting. Again, Andrew Luck probably congratulated him for the dirty hit.
Hydrostan says:
I kicked myself for not muting the sound on the TV. I realize it was pretty much “garbage time” in the 2nd half, but those 2 yokel announcers kept giving every scenario where the Irish wouldn’t make the playoffs. Once or twice would have been more that enough! Wish the game would have been on NBC.
Drasail2 says:
JV
Thanks for the writeup! Only four more this year!
Hydrostan: change the soundtrack.
I can recommend Notre Dame radio. It is shamelessly Irish but Tony Simeone and Ryan Harris do a nice job.
https://www.audacy.com/stations/notredamesports
Scott Theis says:
The announcers. They kept a narrative alive the whole 4th quarter about ND still trying to score, like it was such an unusual occurance. Never mind they had the 3rd string in there for playing time from before the start of that quarter. Never mind they’d taken it easy on the last 3 opponents, and had last minute (second) TDs scored by each. By the last 2 minutes, it was just exhausting. Had to mute it.
Pap says:
The announcers. They reminded me of an annoying drunk that just keeps repeating himself over and over. Guess there was a reason they were assigned the late,late game.
OneHistorian says:
Carr has passed all the tests – so far.
One remains – come from behind in the 4th quarter when you HAVE to.
John Hutton says:
Why stoke the blood pressure? My MUTE button stays on.
β₯οΈ#501988πππͺ says:
J.V. THANK YOU for your unrelenting dedication to give the IRISH FAITHFUL the in-depth knowledge of the program, team and information on the the strengths and weaknesses of the weekly opponent.
I’m glad you mentioned on how the two halves were different for the IRISH and I HOPE IT DOESN”T COST THEM!
I think that hit on Love was deliberate and should have been called.
IF and WHEN the IRISH make the playoffs, I except the IRISH to completely able to manhandle the oppositions! WE’RE READY!