2) The team has ZERO leaders: Floyd doesn’t lead, no QB leads, not even Te’o or Harrison lead, so how do you expect the team to compete in big games!?

3) The team had multiple opportunities to come back, but neither the players or the coaches stepped up. The O-Line makes their D Line look like LSU, the didn’t challenge Stanford on the outside, especially with a running QB and Cierre who is an outside speed back, and Eifert dropped an 1st down when they were driving for the comeback, then the next play the receiver falls down on a first down WR screen. CHOKE!!!

4) BK, quit blaming your players and motivate them like Knute and Lou, or prepare them to death like Frank. Your play-calling mediocre at best, and you haven’t had one decent win. STEP UP!!!

My point on the above is you’re trying to show why you ‘censor opposing viewpoints’ when you’re using the wrong example. Your board rules indicate there should be no name calling – so the above example post you reference should absolutely be censored. That’s not the same censorship people complain about here.

The banning of someone who says what I said is a better example of the type of censorship people complain about. I obviously remember it the best because it was my own.

You are absolutely within your rights to censor whatever you want. If you don’t like Olbermann or Limbaugh, you can just change the channel. You shouldn’t even necessarily care what the outsiders think. I’m just trying to give you the perspective on where the complaints come from.