Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the acf domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home/elkabong/dev.ndnation.com/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6131

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/elkabong/dev.ndnation.com/wp-includes/functions.php:6131) in /home/elkabong/dev.ndnation.com/wp-includes/feed-rss2-comments.php on line 8
Comments on: The 10th Anniversary NDNation Probability Poll https://dev.ndnation.com/the-10th-anniversary-ndnation-probability-poll/ The Independent Voice of Notre Dame Athletics Fri, 11 May 2018 16:51:11 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4 By: SEE https://dev.ndnation.com/the-10th-anniversary-ndnation-probability-poll/#comment-19287 Sun, 28 Aug 2016 16:15:54 +0000 https://dev.ndnation.com/?p=5700#comment-19287 In reply to Huh.

https://dev.ndnation.com/archives/5339

]]>
By: mahern56 https://dev.ndnation.com/the-10th-anniversary-ndnation-probability-poll/#comment-19285 Sun, 28 Aug 2016 14:03:31 +0000 https://dev.ndnation.com/?p=5700#comment-19285 me idea look forward to it every year. Go Irish!

]]>
By: irishhawk50 https://dev.ndnation.com/the-10th-anniversary-ndnation-probability-poll/#comment-19275 Sat, 27 Aug 2016 19:39:34 +0000 https://dev.ndnation.com/?p=5700#comment-19275 We all seem optimistic and I guess with good reason considering the talent on the offensive side of the ball and a “down” year for most of our better opponents. However I still don’t have faith in BVG and considering the talent he had last year and what he produced (the D lost both the Clemson game spotting them 14 and the Stanford game not holding them for less than a minute to end the game). I am worried about what he can do this year. I hope I am wrong, but 10-2 might be optimistic.

]]>
By: elgreco89 https://dev.ndnation.com/the-10th-anniversary-ndnation-probability-poll/#comment-19267 Sat, 27 Aug 2016 01:44:15 +0000 https://dev.ndnation.com/?p=5700#comment-19267 Just have a bad feeling about this season. In college football a great QB can take you far. But we have no defense. I say 8-5. (with a bowl loss)

]]>
By: NDBonecrusher https://dev.ndnation.com/the-10th-anniversary-ndnation-probability-poll/#comment-19264 Fri, 26 Aug 2016 20:09:59 +0000 https://dev.ndnation.com/?p=5700#comment-19264 Agree with PC. Trying to predict this year is harder than trying to predict the election, and can make us look just as foolish! We only have a few “facts”, which are big on observation and small on data. The schedule seems favorable for a playoff run. Opponents are very green at QB. We are very green at WR and defensive secondary. Not having Jones sucks. We ought to be able to run the ball all day. Whichever QB is behind center will be more than adequate. Hell if I know what any of this will translate into, but that’s not keeping me from being in the optimist column. Hoping for a playoff spot is not silly.

]]>
By: CD1 https://dev.ndnation.com/the-10th-anniversary-ndnation-probability-poll/#comment-19251 Thu, 25 Aug 2016 19:09:34 +0000 https://dev.ndnation.com/?p=5700#comment-19251 Worried about the defensive secondary…they will learn throughout the year, but not sure if they have enough experienced not to get burned — especially in the BVG scheme. 10-2 or 9-3 seems the most realistic to me…but I’d love to be wrong!

]]>
By: PC https://dev.ndnation.com/the-10th-anniversary-ndnation-probability-poll/#comment-19250 Thu, 25 Aug 2016 18:29:58 +0000 https://dev.ndnation.com/?p=5700#comment-19250 I’d generally consider myself an optimist going into a season but I don’t love the fact our Irish will be relying on so many inexperienced players. I’m taking a wait and see approach on the 2 Qbs because I cant see Kelly staying with it for long. Inevitably someone will outplay the other and this battle will take care of itself. Its probably one of the hardest years to predict because while the schedule seems fairly manageable the inexperience at WR and holes on D leave me thinking 10-2 with losses at NC ST and USC.
Here’s hoping we stay healthier then last year and are fighting for a playoff spot into November!

]]>
By: tjak https://dev.ndnation.com/the-10th-anniversary-ndnation-probability-poll/#comment-19249 Thu, 25 Aug 2016 16:18:54 +0000 https://dev.ndnation.com/?p=5700#comment-19249 12-0 if we do not lose any more bodies.

]]>
By: Huh https://dev.ndnation.com/the-10th-anniversary-ndnation-probability-poll/#comment-19248 Thu, 25 Aug 2016 15:42:19 +0000 https://dev.ndnation.com/?p=5700#comment-19248 > Fans expected 8.3 wins overall and the optimists expected 10.4 wins.

What does that mean? Are you just calling anyone above the average an optimist?

It’d be interesting to see some analysis over all 10 years of just the overall expectation vs reality (not separating “optimists” or “pessimists”). Or even a breakdown of each type of game now that there’s a little bit of data, for example, for all the games the collective ranked as 65%-75% winnable, ND won X% of them.

]]>
By: james twarek https://dev.ndnation.com/the-10th-anniversary-ndnation-probability-poll/#comment-19247 Thu, 25 Aug 2016 01:44:16 +0000 https://dev.ndnation.com/?p=5700#comment-19247 In reply to Rirish.

undefeated!

]]>